Pediatrics | Eklavya Medical
child_care
medical_services Main Specialty Domain lock Subscription Required

Pediatrics

Child health, neonatal care, pediatric resuscitation, and developmental milestone diagnostics.

verified Verified Medical Faculty menu_book 271 Q&A Modules
lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 171 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Q128. Neuroblastoma

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q128 ★ · DNB/MD 2022/1
Neuroblastoma
Examiner's Intent: Neuroblastoma is favorite given its striking clinical heterogeneity, directly explained by specific molecular risk factors; examiners expect the INRG risk stratification connected to this heterogeneity, and the specific diagnostic tests unique to this tumor type.

Clinical Presentation Based on Anatomical Site

SitePresentation
Adrenal medulla (most common)Abdominal mass, often massive; catecholamine excess only occasionally produces classic hyperadrenergic syndrome despite biochemically elevated metabolites
Paraspinal ganglia“Dumbbell” tumor through neural foramina → spinal cord compression, neurological deficits — emergency
Cervical/thoracic sympathetic chainHorner syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis)
MetastaticBone marrow, bone (pain, limp), liver (esp. infant “Stage MS”), skin (bluish nodules in infants); periorbital ecchymosis (“raccoon eyes”) — orbital bone involvement

INRG Risk Stratification

Integrates: age at diagnosis (infants have better prognosis even with comparable extent), INRG stage, histopathology, and MYCN amplification status.

Distinctive Biology: Stage MS — metastatic disease confined to skin/liver/limited marrow, infants <18 months — paradoxically favorable with substantial spontaneous regression potential, despite being metastatic by conventional logic.

Diagnostic Workup

TestRole
MIBG scanFunctional imaging via norepinephrine-analog uptake; basis for therapeutic 131-I-MIBG radiotherapy in relapsed/refractory disease
Urinary VMA/HVAElevated in most cases — diagnostic support + response/relapse monitoring
MYCN amplificationSingle most important molecular prognostic marker — presence alone places patient in high-risk category regardless of stage

Multimodal Therapy

Risk GroupTreatment
Low-riskSurgery alone, or observation (favorable Stage MS)
Intermediate-riskSurgery + moderate-intensity chemotherapy
High-risk (incl. any MYCN-amplified)Induction chemo + surgery + high-dose chemo with autologous stem cell rescue + radiotherapy + anti-GD2 immunotherapy (dinutuximab) + cytokine therapy + isotretinoin
lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 172 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Q129. Wilms Tumor (Nephroblastoma)

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q129 · DNB/MD 2021/2
Wilms Tumor (Nephroblastoma)
Examiner's Intent: Expects clinical presentation, awareness of the two major differing staging philosophies (COG versus SIOP), and the critical prognostic significance of anaplasia on histopathology.

Clinical Features

Most common pediatric renal malignancy — classically asymptomatic abdominal mass, often incidentally discovered. May also present with abdominal pain, hematuria, hypertension (renin secretion/compression). Associated syndromes: WAGR (Wilms, Aniridia, Genitourinary anomalies, Range of developmental delay), Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, isolated hemihypertrophy — warrant screening ultrasound surveillance.

Staging Systems — COG versus SIOP

ApproachRegionSequenceRationale
COGPredominantly North AmericanUpfront surgical resection → staging from surgical/pathological findings → risk-adapted adjuvant chemo ± RT
SIOPPredominantly EuropeanPre-operative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy first (presumptive imaging diagnosis) → delayed surgeryReduces intraoperative tumor rupture risk by shrinking tumor first
Note: Both approaches show comparable overall survival — two differing, internationally accepted philosophies achieving broadly similar outcomes. Neither is simply “correct.”

Diagnostic Imaging

Abdominal ultrasound → CT/MRI abdomen (extent, renal vein/IVC tumor thrombus assessment) → CT chest (lung is most common metastasis site).

Histopathology — Favorable versus Unfavorable (Anaplastic) Histology

Key Prognostic Factor: Diffuse anaplasia is associated with substantially worse prognosis and mandates significantly more intensive treatment — can override an otherwise favorable clinical stage, analogous to MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma (Q128).

Management Summary

Radical nephrectomy (nephron-sparing for bilateral disease) + risk-adapted chemotherapy (vincristine + actinomycin-D for favorable histology; + doxorubicin for higher-stage/unfavorable histology) + radiotherapy for higher-stage/unfavorable histology. Among the highest survival rates of any pediatric solid malignancy.

lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 173 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Q130. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q130 ★ · DNB/MD 2021/1
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)
Examiner's Intent: HLH is critical, high-mortality-if-missed given its presentation overlaps substantially with sepsis; examiners expect the HLH-2004 criteria precisely, clear primary/secondary distinction, and specific treatment protocol knowledge.

Definition and the Diagnostic Challenge

Key Diagnostic Pitfall: HLH's presentation (fever, cytopenias, hepatosplenomegaly, multi-organ dysfunction) is substantially indistinguishable from severe sepsis at initial presentation — yet HLH requires immunosuppression while sepsis-directed immunosuppression would be actively harmful. Delayed recognition carries substantial mortality risk.

Primary versus Secondary HLH

TypeBasisTypical OnsetNotes
Primary (Familial)Inherited mutations in cytotoxic granule pathway genes (PRF1, UNC13D, etc.)Infancy/early childhoodOften no obvious trigger; extremely high mortality without treatment/HSCT; strong relapse tendency
Secondary (incl. MAS)No genetic cytotoxic defect; triggered by identifiable factorAny ageEBV (classic trigger), malignancy (lymphomas), autoimmune/rheumatic disease (MAS — classically systemic JIA)

HLH-2004 Diagnostic Criteria

Molecular diagnosis, OR 5 of 8 criteria:

  1. Fever
  2. Splenomegaly
  3. Cytopenias in ≥2 of 3 lineages (Hb <9 g/dL, platelets <100,000/µL, neutrophils <1000/µL)
  4. Hypertriglyceridemia (≥3 mmol/L) and/or hypofibrinogenemia (≤1.5 g/L)
  5. Hemophagocytosis in bone marrow, spleen, liver, or lymph node
  6. Low or absent NK-cell activity
  7. Ferritin ≥500 µg/L (markedly higher, e.g. >10,000, is highly suggestive with much better specificity)
  8. Elevated soluble CD25 (soluble IL-2 receptor)

Treatment Protocol

ComponentRole
HLH-94/HLH-2004 protocol (etoposide + dexamethasone; cyclosporine in continuation)Standard backbone; bridge to HSCT for primary/familial HLH (only curative option)
Secondary HLH/MASIdentify and treat the underlying trigger + immunosuppressive HLH-directed therapy
EmapalumabMonoclonal antibody targeting interferon-gamma — for primary HLH refractory to conventional therapy
lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 174 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Q131. Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS)

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q131 · DNB/MD 2020/2
Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS)
Examiner's Intent: Expects the Cairo-Bishop diagnostic definition, and clear prevention/management strategies including the specific distinction between rasburicase and allopurinol use.

Pathophysiology and Cairo-Bishop Definition

Massive, rapid tumor cell death (spontaneous or chemotherapy-precipitated) releases potassium, phosphate, and nucleic acids (metabolized to uric acid) faster than the kidneys can excrete them.

Laboratory TLS (≥2 within window: 3 days before to 7 days after cytotoxic therapy)Threshold
Uric acid≥8 mg/dL (or 25% increase)
Potassium≥6 mmol/L (or 25% increase)
Phosphate≥4.5 mg/dL (or 25% increase)
Calcium≤7 mg/dL (or 25% decrease — falls via calcium-phosphate precipitation)

Clinical TLS = Laboratory TLS + at least one of: acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmia, seizure, or death.

High-Risk Malignancies

Bulky, rapidly-proliferating hematological malignancies — particularly Burkitt lymphoma, ALL (especially high presenting WBC), other high-grade lymphomas.

Prevention — The Cornerstone of Management

MeasureDetails
Aggressive IV hydrationBefore chemotherapy in high-risk patients
RasburicaseRecombinant urate oxidase; preferred for high-risk patients; contraindicated in G6PD deficiency (hemolysis risk from H2O2 by-product)
AllopurinolXanthine oxidase inhibitor; prevents further uric acid formation (does not reduce existing uric acid); reserved for lower/intermediate-risk patients

Management of Established Metabolic Complications

  • Hyperkalemia — calcium gluconate, insulin-dextrose, salbutamol, potassium-binding resins, dialysis for refractory cases
  • Hyperphosphatemia — phosphate binders; avoid calcium supplementation unless symptomatic hypocalcemia (risk of further Ca-phosphate precipitation)
  • Renal replacement therapy — for severe, refractory electrolyte derangement or significant AKI
lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 175 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Q132. Hodgkin & Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q132 · DNB/MD 2020/1
Hodgkin & Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Examiner's Intent: Expects clear distinction between the two lymphoma categories' characteristic subtypes and staging systems, reflecting their genuinely different biological behavior and clinical management approaches.

Hodgkin Lymphoma — Histological Subtypes

Defined by Reed-Sternberg cells (“owl's eye” appearance) in a reactive inflammatory background.

SubtypeNotes
Nodular sclerosisMost common in adolescents/young adults; generally favorable prognosis
Mixed cellularity
Lymphocyte-rich
Lymphocyte-depletedLeast common; less favorable; associated with advanced age/immunocompromise
Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant HLDistinct entity; lacks classic RS cells (“popcorn cells” instead); more indolent course

Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma — Key Subtypes

Unlike adult NHL (dominated by indolent, lower-grade B-cell lymphomas), pediatric NHL is predominantly high-grade, rapidly-proliferating:

  • Burkitt lymphoma — highly aggressive; MYC translocation; particularly high TLS risk (Q131)
  • Lymphoblastic Lymphoma — biologically/clinically closely related to ALL (Q122) — essentially a nodal/mediastinal presentation of the same process
  • Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) — aggressive, somewhat less rapidly-proliferating

Staging Systems

SystemUsed ForStructure
Ann ArborHodgkin lymphoma (and some NHL)Stage I–IV based on nodal regions relative to diaphragm; A/B suffix for systemic “B symptoms”
St. Jude (Murphy)Pediatric NHL specificallyReflects NHL's greater propensity for early, widespread dissemination (marrow, CNS) vs Hodgkin's contiguous nodal spread

Risk-Adapted Chemotherapy

Hodgkin lymphoma treatment (combination chemo, RT used more selectively given long-term toxicity concerns) is generally less intensive than the aggressive, ALL-like/Burkitt-specific protocols required for high-grade pediatric NHL, which also require CNS-directed therapy and aggressive TLS prevention.

lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 176 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q133 · DNB/MD 2019/2
Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
Examiner's Intent: Expects understanding of the single-versus-multisystem clinical spectrum, the concept of "risk organ" involvement determining treatment intensity, and the specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers.

Clinical Spectrum

Clonal proliferation of pathological Langerhans-cell-derived dendritic cells — ranges from isolated single-system disease (single lytic bone lesion; isolated seborrheic-dermatitis-like skin rash in infants) to multisystem disease.

“Risk Organ” Involvement — The Central Prognostic Determinant

Central Framework: Recognized risk organs: liver, spleen, bone marrow (hematopoietic system). Involvement of any is associated with substantially worse prognosis and mandates more intensive treatment — analogous in its central role to MYCN amplification (Q128) and anaplasia (Q129).

Multisystem disease confined to “non-risk” organs (skin, bone, lymph nodes, isolated pituitary/CNS) carries a considerably more favorable prognosis despite multiple organs being involved.

Diabetes insipidus is a particularly important, relatively common complication (hypothalamic-pituitary infiltration) — can be presenting or evolve during the disease course.

Histopathology — CD1a and Langerin (CD207)

Diagnosis requires biopsy with immunohistochemistry positive for CD1a and Langerin (CD207) — Langerin reflects Birbeck granule formation.

Treatment Protocols

CategoryTreatment
Single-system, single-site (bone/skin)Local treatment (curettage, local steroid injection) or observation — spontaneous regression potential
Multisystem, no risk organ involvementStandard systemic chemotherapy (vinblastine + prednisolone-based)
Multisystem WITH risk organ involvementMore intensive treatment; early treatment-response assessment carries substantial prognostic significance
lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 177 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Hereditary Spherocytosis & Hemolytic Anemias

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q134 · DNB/MD 2019/1
Hereditary Spherocytosis & Hemolytic Anemias
Examiner's Intent: Expects the specific membrane protein defects, appropriate diagnostic tests (with attention to the shift toward newer testing modalities), splenectomy indications, and essential post-splenectomy infection prevention.

Membrane Defect

Mutations affecting red cell membrane cytoskeletal proteins — most commonly ankyrin and spectrin; less commonly band 3 and protein 4.2. Deficiency → progressive membrane surface area loss (vesiculation) → spherocytic shape with reduced surface-area-to-volume ratio → trapped/destroyed in splenic microcirculation → extravascular hemolysis.

Diagnostic Tests

TestMethodNotes
Osmotic fragility testIncreased fragility/lysis in progressively hypotonic salineTraditional; reduced sensitivity for mild cases, limited specificity
EMA binding testFlow cytometry — measures dye binding to band 3 protein; reduced binding in HSNewer, preferred, superior sensitivity/specificity; small sample needed

Indications for Splenectomy

Curative/near-curative (eliminates primary site of destruction). Recommended for moderate-to-severe hemolysis (significant anemia, recurrent symptomatic gallstones, growth impairment); mild, well-compensated disease may be observed. Generally deferred until age 5–6 years where feasible given young children's elevated OPSI risk.

Post-Splenectomy Infection Prevention

MeasureDetails
VaccinationPneumococcal, meningococcal, Hib — ideally ≥2 weeks before elective splenectomy
Lifelong penicillin prophylaxisParticularly emphasized in young children; some guidelines continue into adulthood for highest-risk patients
Patient/family educationPrompt medical attention for febrile illness — OPSI can progress rapidly to fatal sepsis
lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 178 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

G6PD Deficiency & Oxidative Hemolysis

description Clinical Response
Q135 · DNB/MD 2018/2
G6PD Deficiency & Oxidative Hemolysis
Examiner's Intent: Expects genetic basis, specific recognized triggers (of direct, practical clinical relevance), the important neonatal jaundice association, and correct diagnostic testing timing.

Genetics

X-linked — affected males (hemizygous) typically more severely/consistently affected; heterozygous female carriers show variable expressivity from random X-inactivation (lyonization).

Triggers for Acute Hemolytic Crises

G6PD deficiency impairs NADPH generation (pentose phosphate pathway) → reduced glutathione → vulnerability to oxidative stress.

TriggerExamples
MedicationsPrimaquine and related 8-aminoquinolines (P. vivax radical cure — requires G6PD screening first), sulfonamides, nitrofurantoin, other oxidant drugs
Fava bean ingestionClassic “favism” — certain Mediterranean/Middle Eastern variants particularly sensitive
InfectionAcute infectious illness alone can precipitate sufficient oxidative stress

Association with Neonatal Jaundice

Note: Important recognized cause of significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, sometimes with kernicterus risk — even modest, subclinical hemolysis can meaningfully contribute given the immature neonatal liver's limited conjugation capacity.

Diagnostic Screening Tests

Timing Pitfall: G6PD activity testing during/immediately after an acute hemolytic episode can be falsely normal — the most deficient (oldest) cells are preferentially destroyed, leaving a younger-cell-enriched population with relatively higher activity. Test should be deferred several weeks after full resolution.

Management

Remove offending trigger, supportive care (hydration, transfusion for severe anemia), monitor/manage hyperbilirubinemia (neonatal context: standard phototherapy/exchange transfusion principles). Long-term: patient/family education on trigger avoidance — no curative treatment for the enzymatic deficiency itself.

lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 179 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Coagulation Cascade & Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q136 · DNB/MD 2017/2
Coagulation Cascade & Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)
Examiner's Intent: Expects the standard laboratory panel for bleeding disorder evaluation and its interpretation pattern for DIC specifically, along with core management principles.

Laboratory Evaluation of Bleeding Disorders

TestAssesses
PTExtrinsic and common pathways
aPTTIntrinsic and common pathways
Thrombin Time (TT)Final fibrinogen-to-fibrin conversion; sensitive to fibrinogen abnormalities or circulating inhibitors (e.g., heparin)
Fibrinogen levelQuantitative fibrinogen
D-DimerFibrin degradation product — reflects ongoing fibrinolysis of cross-linked fibrin

Pathophysiology and Management of DIC in Sepsis

Widespread, dysregulated coagulation activation, most commonly triggered by severe sepsis/septic shock (Section 2, Q23). Inflammatory/endothelial injury → widespread inappropriate coagulation → consumption of clotting factors/platelets (paradoxical bleeding tendency) + widespread microvascular thrombosis (end-organ dysfunction).

Laboratory Pattern: Characteristic pattern: prolonged PT/aPTT, low fibrinogen, thrombocytopenia, markedly elevated D-dimer — combined consumptive coagulopathy with ongoing fibrin formation/breakdown.

Management

Fundamentally: aggressive treatment of the underlying triggering condition (source control + antimicrobials) — DIC will not resolve without addressing the driver. Supportive blood product replacement: FFP (factor replacement), cryoprecipitate (significant hypofibrinogenemia), platelet transfusion (significant thrombocytopenia with bleeding/procedures) — a bridging, not definitive, role.

lock Protected Clinical Document • Pulse App • Screenshots Strictly Prohibited
QUESTION 180 person Asked by .
bookmark_add

Nutritional Anemias: B12 and Folate Deficiency

collections Question Diagrams & Reference Images (1)
Question Reference Diagram
zoom_in View Image
description Clinical Response
Q137 · DNB/MD 2016/1
Nutritional Anemias: B12 and Folate Deficiency
Examiner's Intent: Expects the shared megaloblastic mechanism, the critical distinguishing neurological feature of B12 (versus folate) deficiency, and appropriate diagnostic approach.

Shared Megaloblastic Mechanism

Both are essential cofactors for DNA synthesis (thymidylate synthesis) — deficiency impairs DNA synthesis while relatively sparing RNA/protein synthesis → nuclear-cytoplasmic maturation asynchrony → macrocytic anemia, hypersegmented neutrophils, megaloblastic marrow changes.

Neurological Manifestations — The Key B12-Specific Distinguishing Feature

Critical Clinical Pitfall: Only B12 deficiency, NOT folate deficiency, causes neurological manifestations — classically subacute combined degeneration (posterior column + lateral corticospinal tract demyelination), peripheral neuropathy, and in children, potential developmental regression. Folate supplementation alone can mask/correct the hematological picture of unrecognized concurrent B12 deficiency while neurological injury progresses unchecked.

Pediatric-Specific Context

In infants, B12 deficiency classically results from exclusive breastfeeding by a B12-deficient mother (strict vegan diet, unrecognized pernicious anemia/malabsorption) — presents with failure to thrive, developmental regression, irritability.

Diagnostic Workup

  • Serum B12 and folate levels
  • Serum methylmalonic acid (MMA) — elevated specifically in B12 (not folate) deficiency — confirmatory when serum B12 is borderline
  • Peripheral blood smear (macrocytosis, hypersegmented neutrophils)
  • Cause-directed evaluation (dietary history, maternal B12 status, malabsorption workup)

Showing 171180 of 271 questions

account_tree

Subcategory Tree

Explore Pediatrics subcategories

folder_special Pediatrics
Main
lock

Category Subscription

Subscribe to Pediatrics to unlock this module and all nested subcategories.

  • check_circle Access Pediatrics & all subcategories
  • check_circle Detailed, Peer-Reviewed Answers
  • check_circle High-yield visual aids & imaging
Get Category Subscription arrow_forward
Secure 256-bit SSL Connection

Anatomical Models

Explore high-fidelity 3D visualizations included in premium modules.

Case Reviews

Real-world clinical scenarios narrated by senior consultants.

Pulse App