Define the ERAS concept and its physiological rationale. Describe the pre-operative, intraoperative, and postoperative components of a colorectal ERAS programme. Summarise the evidence base and outcomes achieved with ERAS implementation.
Traditional care pathways allowed or amplified the surgical stress response: prolonged fasting → catabolism, insulin resistance; hypothermia → impaired coagulation and immune function; large-volume IV fluids → bowel oedema and anastomotic leak; opioid analgesia → ileus, nausea, sedation, respiratory depression; immobility → DVT, deconditioning, pneumonia
ERAS systematically addresses each factor: carbohydrate loading reduces pre-operative insulin resistance by 50%; targeted fluid therapy prevents both hypovolaemia and fluid overload; regional analgesia eliminates systemic opioids; early feeding and mobilisation restore gut motility and physical function; the combined effect reduces the magnitude of the catabolic stress response from major surgery, allowing early functional recovery Kehlet's original concept (1997): Henrik Kehlet (Lancet 1997) demonstrated that major colonic surgery could be performed with a 2-day hospital stay using multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early oral nutrition, and early mobilisation — the founding evidence for ERAS
Phase ERAS Component Evidence/Mechanism Pre- Patient education and counselling Patients who understand the ERAS plan and their role in recovery comply better with early feeding and mobilisation; operative anxiety reduction → lower analgesic requirements Preoperative carbohydrate loading Reduces insulin resistance by 50%; reduces preoperative thirst/hunger/anxiety; improves postoperative muscle (200–400 mL 12.5% carbohydrate function; supported by Cochrane review — reduces hospital stay by 0.5–1 day drink, 2–3 hours before surgery) Clear fluid fasting up to 2 hours Evidence-based replacement for "NPO from midnight"; no increased aspiration risk; reduces preoperative (solid food up to 6 hours) discomfort; reduces catabolism from prolonged fasting Bowel preparation (OMIT for most Traditional mechanical bowel prep dehydrates patients and worsens electrolyte imbalance without reducing colorectal surgery) anastomotic leak rates (Cochrane 2011) — omitted in most ERAS colorectal protocols Anaemia assessment and Preoperative anaemia is a major risk factor for transfusion and complications; correcting Hb ≥100 g/L reduces treatment (if Hb <100 g/L → iron transfusion requirement and length of stay supplementation or erythropoietin if time allows) Intra- TIVA or volatile anaesthesia with PONV causes delayed oral intake and prolonged bed rest — specifically addressed in ERAS; TIVA reduces PONV operative multimodal PONV prophylaxis (min. 2 25–30%; dexamethasone also reduces fatigue and pain agents: ondansetron + dexamethasone) Avoidance of long-acting opioids; Intraoperative opioids contribute to postoperative ileus; remifentanil provides precise intraoperative analgesia with remifentanil intraoperative immediate offset; no contribution to postoperative ileus when stopped at end of surgery; regular NSAIDs and paracetamol for post-op baseline analgesia
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDT) OPTIMISE trial: ODM-GDT reduced postoperative complications by 20%; avoids both hypovolaemia (anastomotic — ODM or FloTrac guided ischaemia) and hypervolaemia (bowel oedema, anastomotic leak, cardiorespiratory complications); targeted fluid to optimise SV; vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension rather than volume Temperature maintenance Hypothermia increases wound infection, coagulopathy, cardiac events; active warming — forced-air blanket, warm (normothermia ≥36.5°C) fluids, warm gases, theatre temperature 21–22°C; NICE recommends core temp >36°C throughout surgery
Minimally invasive surgery Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: reduced pain, faster bowel recovery, shorter hospital stay vs open; smaller (laparoscopic vs open) incisions → less incisional pain → less splinting → better respiratory function; does not eliminate the need for ERAS (laparoscopic + ERAS = best outcomes) Thoracic epidural or paravertebral Thoracic epidural analgesia for open colorectal: reduces opioid requirements, allows early mobilisation, reduces block for open surgery; TAP block ileus, reduces PPCs; for laparoscopic: bilateral TAP blocks + NSAIDs + paracetamol replaces epidural for laparoscopic Post- Early oral nutrition (day 0 — same Traditionally, patients were "nil by mouth until bowel sounds return" — no evidence base for this; early oral nutrition operative day as surgery) maintains gut mucosal integrity, reduces infection risk, reduces ileus by stimulating gut motility via the gastrocolic reflex; NGT removal before end of surgery; clear fluids within 2–4 hours of operation; diet as tolerated from day 1 Early mobilisation (out of bed day Immobility → DVT, deconditioning, pneumonia, prolonged ileus; early ambulation reverses these; supervised 1, with target of 2 hours out of bed physiotherapy from day 1; functional milestones set daily increasing daily) Opioid-sparing analgesia — Opioids → ileus + respiratory depression + PONV; multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia maintains adequate pain NSAIDs + paracetamol + regional ± control while dramatically reducing opioid-related complications low-dose oral opioid PRN Urinary catheter removal day 1 (if Urinary catheter delays mobilisation and increases UTI risk; removed as soon as epidural is stopped or day 1 if no no epidural) epidural IV fluid discontinuation / removal IV fluids → sedentary behaviour + fluid overload; oral fluids maintain hydration without restricting mobilisation of IV cannula by day 1–2
Varadhan KK et al. (BJA 2010, meta-analysis): ERAS for colorectal surgery reduces LOS by 2.5 days (from 7.5 to 5.0 days average) and reduces complication rate by 30% vs traditional care; no increase in readmission rates — demonstrating that early discharge is safe
Gustafsson UO et al. (Arch Surg 2011): higher compliance with individual ERAS elements correlates directly with better outcomes — the benefit is additive; implementing only some elements produces partial benefit; full protocol compliance produces maximal benefit
Cost savings: reduced LOS → significant cost savings per patient; ERAS implementation has positive return on investment even accounting for the cost of multidisciplinary programme establishment
ERAS Society: publishes specialty-specific guidelines for colorectal, gynaecological, liver, bariatric, thoracic, and urological surgery; all follow the same core principles adapted for specific surgical and physiological contexts